Online access to case information for payments in pick out juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases could be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
The main target is to the intention to cause injury. This is usually a major trouble: a very minimal threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of one day in the registration of FIR which has not been explained through the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness in the alleged occurrence as well as the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to generally be the real brothers in the deceased but they didn't respond at all towards the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not seem much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on so many events that extra judicial confession of an accused is really a weak variety of evidence which might be manoeuvred with the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution can be depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding existence of some light at the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners collectively with a motorcycle at four.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal assistance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to your court in which the case has become or will be filed.
three. I have listened to the learned counsel for the parties and have absent through the record of this case with their equipped assistance.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, Additionally it is a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is very well-settled that whilst looking at the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to take into account the benefit of many of the suitable candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of qualified candidates who're found for being most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to extend favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part on the respondent department.
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 on the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm check here to some person causes death of such person, both by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is alleged to commit qatl-i-khata.”
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, along with the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf in the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian ad litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for just a dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their Employment with DCFS.
Knowledge of your accused is actually a matter to get inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very difficult for being proved otherwise.”
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It involves the execution from the convicted person being a consequence of their crime.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Except if case is experimented with(Bail Matters)
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres towards the doctrine of stare decisis
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were told in the boy’s past, they asked if their children were safe with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had absolutely nothing to fret about.